Reaching Out, Joining In: Teaching Social Skills to Young Children with Autism

Weiss, M. J. & Harris, S. L. (2001) Reaching Out, Joining In: Teaching Social Skills to Young Children with Autism BETHESDA, MD, USA; Woodbine House Inc. 


'If a child is nonverbal, there are still skills... that will be relevant for them. Remember that communication is both verbal and nonverbal, and that expression can take many forms besides verbal communication.' (for example, understanding the nonverbal communication of others) (pp70)


 The Language of Social Skills (pp71)

  • appropriate social behaviour
  • following social rules
  • getting and giving information
  • maintaining a conversation
  • slang, idioms, and expressions
  • telling jokes
  • using gestures

Conversational Exchange 
'As the grammatical complexity of a child's language increases, so too does his ability to carry his own end of a conversation. Initially, it takes a great deal of work from the adult to sustain a conversation with the child. As the child gets older, he reciprocates with an adult more skillfully, and can carry on conversation with a peer.'
'conversations with a peer occur later, because childre are not as aware of the need to create a supportive structure for sustaining the echange. In fact, this is one of the reasons children with autism have a harder time conversing with peers than with adults. Adults have a very nuanced ability to recognise the needs of the child with autism and provide the right prompts. A child, no matter how well intentioned, will not understand how to do this and after a few attempts may give up on the dialog.'


      Teaching the Language of Social Skills
      'Children with autism are doubly challenged in learning the language of social sills. First, they struggle with understanding social information and with learning how to interact with peers. Second, understanding and using complex language is a significant challenge for many of them. As a result, learning to manage social interaction often presents formidable language demands along with social ones.'

      • Is this why echolalia occurs?
      • Are children repeating because they are not understanding to the concept?

      Social Stories
      'social stories are brief, written narratives about what will happen or how a child is expected to behave in a specific situation. These stories are written in simple language and capture the essence of a social behaviour.'
      'Carol Gray, an educator employed by a school system in Michigan, created social stories as a means to convey complex social information to children with autism... She suggests that one directive (rule) statement be given for every three to five informative sentences that describe the situation or give perspective on behaviour.'
      • Will the stories told relate to a social story that has been repeatedly told to the child?
      • Will statements given refelct this, or will the program's more open-plan approach mean that the statements won't come up as the system of storytelling is less regimented?
      • Should there be more of a 'rule' structure to the overall storytelling process?

      Michael Rosen on Children's Storytelling

      "All the nitty-gritty of everday life for children can never be written about, but they can do it. They can do it, and they do. They do it with their everyday experience and with their own language."

      Children as Story-Tellers: Developing Language Skills in the Classroom

      Jennings, C. (1991) Children as Story-tellers: Developing Language Skills in the Classroom MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA; Oxford University Press

      Retelling of original stories (pp22)
      'Children are always eager to retell a story they have just read or heard and often want to work on the one told at the start of the session. They should be encouraged to select favourite stories from books they have read in the past. This can include any stories read to them by parents, teachers and librarians, or those they have experienced in their personal reading.
      There are many advantages of allowing children to retell traditional or contemporary stories, including:
      • Children initially select old favourites which can be recalled immediately
      • The familiarity which children feel with the known structure of previously shared stories enhances their confidence in their choices
      • making a retold story their own by creating a personal interpretation based on their experience of the story'

      • Can we tell more about the learner by the way they re-tell a story?
      • As far as autism is concerned, can we ientify what stage of the spectrum they are at by their ability to retell a known story? (assessment through storytelling, perhaps)
      • Can we assess the ability to communicate through the child's re-telling? Do they 'put on' the act of a storyteller, away from their own persona?
      • As far as the project is concerned, should a story be selected for the child to retell, or should it remain open? Should they retell a story personal to them, from their own life?

      Personal Experience Stories (pp18)
      'Children have an instinctive feel for story, blending instances and episodes from their own experiences into oral narratives, therefore these personal anecdotes are natural items in a story-telling session. Exchanging personal experiences with peers is authentic because childeren identify with the similarity of events in other children's lives.

      • Should the project be done with more than one child at a time?
      • Should the opportunity to 'feed' off each other's stories be given?
      • Should the story being told be collaborative?
      • Will there be as much similarity of experience with children with autism, or is it more personal / centered?
      • Will there still be a clear oral culture of speaker / listener if it is done with a group?

      PLAN: Literature Review

      What the FYP guidebook says
      You must show clearly you are conversant with what is already known in this area of research. This needs to be organised systematically, and include critical analysis of what you have read. It should be based largely on primary sources. You may find conflicting research evidence. Your discussion of literature should show how you have weighed this up, the theoretical standpoint from which you have done this, and on what you base your critiques. This placing of the work in an actual context thus becomes an aspect of your rationale for undertaking this study.


      General questions I need to ask
      • What is my theoretical standpoint?
      • What do I already expect to happen?
      • What do I already know? (previous experience, etc.)
      • Are there conflicting views? (in the forms of different strategies, probably?)
      • Are there different strategies for speech aquisition in autism?
      Language Aquisition (general)
      • Different ways of doing it
      • What works? What doesn't?
      • How LONG does it take in comparison to austitic language development?
      • Is it a case of 'do this, but just do it more often and for longer?'


      Development of Language in Autism
      • Various ways of doing it - look at differences
      • common practice - what is done?
      • Are there misconceptions?
      • What is done differently to mainstream language learning - are there different things to focus on?
      • What works? What have I seen?
      • Models: Medical, psycholinguistic etc.


      Recollection in Autism / Echolalia
      • Differing opinions on echolalia
      • Is it as useful / purposeful as it is deemed?
      • Is the child realising what they are repeating?
      • How can you tell?
      • How is this relevant?

      Beneficial Uses of ICT with Children with SEN
      • Creating a barrier (not so social?)
      • Is this barrier beneficial for children with autism to focus more on their work/tasks?
      • Looking at different programmes available (autism specific?)

      Access Technology: Making the Right Choice

      Day, J. (e)(1995) Access Technology: Making The Right Choice COVENTRY; NCET

      Types of Access for IT
      • Physcial Access
      Technology provides independent access to a world of communication and learning that has been closed until now. It is no wonder than we consider IT in the context of physical access as a lifeline.
      • Cognitive Access
      By experiencing learning in an active way, they are helped to identify similar situations in the world around them. The common factor in these experiences is that IT is providing an additional resource to facilitate the learnig process for these pupils.
      • Supportive Access
      The power of technology to support pupils in different areas of difficulty.
      The pupil who is wary of failure in the learning process can explore ideas on the computer in a supportive environment.


      Framework for ICT-based Provision
      • Context
      • Purpose
      • Resourcing
      • Support
      • Expectations
      • Management
      • Monitoring
      • Transition
      (this could be used as a basis to ensure the progression from stroytelling using the ICT program into written / drawn stories, or recalling a story without a visual prompt)


      IT and Emotional / Behavioural
      • IT can provide a non-threatening environment in which to achieve success
      • The computer provides a neutral setting... the pupil is controlling the pace and level of work
      • for the learner who is unsure about the acceptability of his work, the computer constitutes a private world in which to experiment safely

      Speech and Language
      • For some learners with speech and language difficulties, information technology is a lifeline, enabling them to communicate with the world around them.

      Teaching Children With Autism: Strategies to Enhance Communication and Socialisation

      Quill, K. A. (1995) 'Teaching Children With Autism: Strategies to Enhance Communication and Socialisation' LONDON; Delmar Publishers


      Echolalia
      • Repetition of other's speech, may occur immediately after or significantly later than the original production of an utterance
      • 85% of children with autism use echolalia if they manage to acquire speech


      Wetherby, A. M. & Prizant, B. M. (1989) 'The Expression of Communicative Intent' Seminars of Speech and Language, 10, (pp77-91)

      Communicative intent with echolalia
      • used for normal children, but also useful in identifying underlying echoic utterances in chidren with autiss
      1. No awareness of goal
      No emotion
      Not directly involved
      Passive behaviour / verbal interaction limited

      2. Awareness of goal
      focus of attention
      manipulates object / vocalise towards
      may relate a sentence to the task, but not directly to a person

      3. Simple plan to achieve a goal
      focus of attention
      direct language towards a person for a desired outcome
      echo to question = the answer to the question